“Our patent pending, melt-free, non-messy, edible martini glasses will steal the show, as they are the first of their kind, offering a parade of color and elegance. Varieties of edible molds include chocolate, white chocolate, peanut butter cup, and colored white chocolate to match any party color scheme. Imagine the buzz around a colorful Bar Candy bar where the selections range from Bubble-gum martinis to Peanut Butter and Jelly-tinis!  Or present a classy white chocolate martini in a white chocolate glass.

Fill the chocolate champagne glasses with your favorite champagne! Perfect for a Chocolate champagne bar

Kids will love the non-alcoholic Bling-tinis, Smurf-tinis, and cotton candy-tins, just to name a few

It’s a must for Weddings. Create a dessert martini table! You can serve several color selections, or we will match the white chocolate with different colored chocolate and garnishes to match your color scheme. You can also display on your actual dessert table, or have your waiters pass around these delectable eye catching cocktails after dinner!”

JANUARY 5:

Threats to attack Paris’s Eiffel Tower and the city’s gay mayor, Bertrand Delanoë, are posted on a website catering to Islamic fundamentalists. The mayor — who was stabbed in a 2002 antigay attack — later announces his interest in running for president of France.

We came up with a few others too.  Check out their list here.  What were your top ten?

The New Jersey Division on Civil Rights ruled today in favor of a same-sex couple who sued the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association for banning civil union ceremonies at the town’s public boardwalk pavilion.

The Division ruled that the couple, Harriet Bernstein and Luisa Paster, have “probable cause” to claim that the ban violates New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination.   Today’s opinion was based on the boardwalk pavilion’s being public by nature of its historic use, open to everyone for decades without restrictions.  In fact, the Camp Meeting Association had for years advanced that very argument, by applying for – and receiving – state tax breaks under New Jersey’s “Green Acres” program that requires facilities to be open and nondiscriminatory to all. 

As the Division on Civil Rights ruled today, the Camp Meeting Association’s ban was discriminatory because it has prohibited same-sex civil unions at the public boardwalk pavilion, but not opposite-sex marriages.

The decision in the latest in a series of blows to the Camp Meeting Association’s campaign to discriminate against same-sex couples.  In September 2007, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ended the Camp Meeting Association’s tax breaks for the public boardwalk pavilion area, based on the Association’s discriminatory ban on civil unions.

Garden State Equality and Ocean Grove United have been relentless in leading grassroots opposition to the ban – Garden State Equality at the statewide level and Ocean Grove United at the local level.  The couple, Harriet Bernstein and Luisa Paster, are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey.

“Though we’re not home free yet, today’s decision by the Corzine Administration is a significant victory for liberty and justice for all in Ocean Grove,” said Steven Goldstein, chair of Garden State Equality.  “The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association has only itself to blame for pursuing a lawsuit that will cost it hundreds of thousands of dollars – and potentially millions of dollars in potential tourism to Ocean Grove, known across the country as a leading LGBT-friendly destination. 

“The question is, how much more hell will the Camp Meeting Association, and its national right-wing extremist backers, put the good people of Ocean Grove through?   We all know how this saga will wind up.  The boardwalk will eventually be re-open to civil unions.  Our side is winning juncture after juncture in this case because the law is overwhelmingly on our side.  It’s time for the Camp Meeting Association to see the handwriting on the pavilion, and end its discriminatory ban now.”

In a second complaint against the Camp Meeting Association, the New Jersey Division of Civil Rights today ruled there was no probable cause, based solely on the timing of the complaint by the same-sex couple involved there, Jan Moore and Emily Sonnessa.  They filed their complaint once the Camp Meeting Association decided to ban both opposite-sex weddings and same-sex civil unions at the boardwalk pavilion, thus preempting the question of discrimination against civil union couples.

Related:

NJ finds group discriminated by barring ceremony;  By GEOFF MULVIHILL | Associated Press Writer via Newsday.com